Fictionalized 'Kindly' Nazi Creates A Stir
The Kindly Ones, by Jonathan Littell, is the fictional first-person memoir of a cultured German who loves Bach, cherishes great literature — and also happens to be a former Nazi exterminator.
The novel has already sold more than a million copies in France, where it won the country's highest literary prize, but it's also been the subject of fierce denunciations for what its critics call a sympathetic portrayal of a cold-blooded murderer who commits incest with his sister and who may have murdered his own mother.
For many readers and critics, the most startling element of The Kindly Ones is not merely the graphic descriptions of slaughter. Instead, it's the quiet, rather avuncular tone of the narrator, Max Aue, who begins his story as a memoir decades after the war. Having escaped prosecution as a Nazi, he passed as an ordinary Frenchman and became the manager of a fine lace factory in Northern France.
Though Max's colleagues describe him as "a calm, collected, thoughtful man," his self-perception is more complicated and violent:
Littell, who is American, wrote The Kindly Ones in French six years ago, basing the main character on himself: "The basic idea is, what would I have been had I been born German in 1913 instead of an American boy in America in 1967," he explains.
Littell says he was as startled as anyone else when the book sold 300,000 copies in three months. As for the controversy, he dismisses historians who accuse him of inaccurately characterizing the Nazi SS and others who say Max is too thoughtful to be believed.
"That's the reader's problem, it's not my problem," he says. "I don't get mixed up in other people's debate about the book. Some people hate it, some people like it. ... But it's not my problem anymore."
The author flatly rejects the notion that The Kindly Ones is historical fiction. Instead, Littell sees the work as phantasmagorical, more in the tradition of William Burroughs than Flaubert or Tolstoy — to whom he has also been compared.
But Holocaust historian Edouard Hussen says that kind of intellectualization denies how the SS's Einsatzgruppen extermination teams really worked. He adds that the book's protagonist, Max, "is, from an ethical point of view, really disgusting" — and he's not a very convincing character, either.
"He wouldn't have stayed more than two days in the Einsatzgruppen if he had been an SS officer at that time, because he's always asking himself why he's here, never acting," says Hussen. "Somebody like Max Aue would have been sent back to Berlin to do some bureaucratic work."
Hussen says he was disturbed by Max's utter absence of empathy with the victims of the SS as well as the character's unseemly descriptions of the Nazis' sexual mutilation prisoners.
"The constant voyeurism about the victims — I found it unbearable," says Hussen. "I've been meeting witnesses of that time. ... these people would never have spoken of the victims as Max Aue is doing. ... They wouldn't have spoken of them without any respect as Jonathan Littell is doing."
But for Littell, who is himself Jewish, today's moral necessity is not to comprehend or bring empathy to the victims — 50 years of Holocaust history have documented their stories, he says. Rather, he says, it is the perpetrators whom we must understand, including the possibility that ordinary Americans and ordinary French — like ordinary Germans — are also capable of the most grotesque acts.
"Abu Grahib is a good example," says Littell. "You find all these figures. The sexualization of violence. The laughter of the killer. Those photos are extraordinary."
Copyright 2023 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.